Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCallizo-Romero, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorTutnjević, Slavica
dc.contributor.authorPandza, Maja
dc.contributor.authorOuellet, Marc
dc.contributor.authorKranjec, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorIlić, Sladjana
dc.contributor.authorGu, Yan
dc.contributor.authorGöksun, Tilbe
dc.contributor.authorChahboun, Sobh
dc.contributor.authorCasasanto, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Julio
dc.coverage.spatialNorway, Trondheim.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-23T11:30:26Z
dc.date.available2022-06-23T11:30:26Z
dc.date.created2022-04-30T13:33:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationLanguage and Cognition. 2022, 14 (2), 1-28.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1866-9808
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3000239
dc.description.abstractDoes temporal thought extend asymmetrically into the past and the future? Do asymmetries depend on cultural differences in temporal focus? Some studies suggest that people in Western (arguably future-focused) cultures perceive the future as being closer, more valued, and deeper than the past (a future asymmetry), while the opposite is shown in East Asian (arguably past-focused) cultures. The proposed explanations of these findings predict a negative relationship between past and future: the more we delve into the future, the less we delve into the past. Here, we report findings that pose a significant challenge to this view. We presented several tasks previously used to measure temporal asymmetry (self-continuity, time discounting, temporal distance, and temporal depth) and two measures of temporal focus to American, Spanish, Serbian, Bosniak, Croatian, Moroccan, Turkish, and Chinese participants (total N = 1,075). There was an overall future asymmetry in all tasks except for temporal distance, but the asymmetry only varied with cultural temporal focus in time discounting. Past and future held a positive (instead of negative) relation in the mind: the more we delve into the future, the more we delve into the past. Finally, the findings suggest that temporal thought has a complex underlying structure.en_US
dc.description.abstractDoes time extend asymmetrically into the past and the future? A multitask crosscultural studyen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectCross-cultural studies;en_US
dc.subjectself-continuity;en_US
dc.subjecttemporal asymmetry;en_US
dc.subjecttemporal depth;en_US
dc.subjecttemporal distance;en_US
dc.subjecttime discounting;en_US
dc.subjecttemporal focus.en_US
dc.titleDoes time extend asymmetrically into the past and the future? A multitask crosscultural studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeDoes time extend asymmetrically into the past and the future? A multitask crosscultural studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder©2022 Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-28en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalLanguage and Cognitionen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/langcog.2022.5
dc.identifier.cristin2020313
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal